background-image: url("images/blue.jpg") background-size: cover class: inverse <br><br><br><br> ## Quantifying Plug-in Electric Vehicle<br>Mileage and Resale Value **.white[John Paul Helveston]**, George Washington University<br> Lujin Zhao, George Washington University<br> Laura Roberson, George Washington University<br> Eliese Ottinger, George Washington University<br> Saurav Pantha, George Washington University June 20, 2024 --- # .center[Two Studies, One Dataset] .leftcol[ ### Measuring Electric Vehicle<br>**Mileage** in the United States Zhao, L., Ottinger, E., Yip, A., & Helveston, J.P. (2023) “[Quantifying electric vehicle mileage in the United States](https://www.cell.com/joule/abstract/S2542-4351(23)00404-X)” _Joule_. 7, 1–15. <center> <img src="images/qr-joule.png" width=30%> </center> ] .rightcol[ ### Measuring Electric Vehicle<br>**Resale Value** in the United States Roberson, Laura A., Pantha, S., & Helveston, J.P. (2024) “[Battery-Powered Bargains? Assessing Electric Vehicle Resale Value in the United States](https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1748-9326/ad3fce)” _Environmental Research Letters_. <center> <img src="images/qr-erl.png" width=30%> </center> ] --- background-color: #fff ### .center[**Data**: ~13M used vehicle listings from 60k dealerships (2016 - 2022)] <center> <img src="images/table-data-summary.png" width=850> </center> --- class: middle, inverse .leftcol70[ ## Quantifying Electric Vehicle Mileage in the United States Lujin Zhao (Ph.D. Student)<br> Eliese Ottinger (Undergraduate RA)<br> John Paul Helveston, Ph.D. The George Washington University ] .rightcol30[ <br> <center> <img src="images/qr-joule.png" width=60%> </center> ] --- # .center[We really need to understand PEV usage] <br> -- ### - PEV emissions reduction benefit **depends on vehicle usage**<br>.font80[[Jenn (2020)](https://www.nature.com/articles/s41560-020-0632-7)] -- ### - Modelers typically assume **BEV miles = CV miles** -- ### - Revenue from proposed mileage tax **depends on vehicle usage**<br>.font80[[Metcalf et al. (2022)](https://doi.org/10.1086/722672); [Zhao and Mattauch (2022)](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2022.102747); [Davis and Sallee (2020)](https://doi.org/10.1086/706793)] -- ### - PEV adoption depends on **how well PEVs substitute for CVs**<br>.font80[[Xing et al. (2021)](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2021.102432)] --- background-image: url("images/table-lit1.png") background-size: cover ### .center[Conflicting prior results on BEV mileage] --- background-image: url("images/table-lit2.png") background-size: cover ### .center[.blue[Conflicting prior results on BEV mileage]] --- background-image: url("images/table-lit3.png") background-size: cover ### .center[.red[Inconsistent data quality in prior studies]] --- class: center background-color: #fff ## BEVs are driven significantly less than other powertrains <center> <img src="images/mileage-all.png" width=100%> </center> --- background-color: #fff class: center ### Teslas driven more than non-Tesla BEVs (but not as much as CVs) <center> <img src="images/mileage-bev.png" width=800> </center> --- class: center background-color: #fff ## BEVs are driven significantly less than other powertrains <center> <img src="images/mileage-all.png" width=100%> </center> `\(mileage = \beta_0 + \beta_1age+\beta_2{age*powertrain}+\beta_3{age}*cents\_p\_mile+\epsilon_i\)` --- background-color: #fff .leftcol80[ <center> <img src="images/table-reg-pooled.png" width=100%> </center> ] --- background-color: #fff .leftcol80[ <center> <img src="images/table-reg-pooled1.png" width=100%> </center> ] .rightcol20[ ### .red[BEVs driven 4,500 miles less than CVs on average] ] --- background-color: #fff .leftcol80[ <center> <img src="images/table-reg-pooled2.png" width=100%> </center> ] .rightcol20[ ### BEVs driven 4,500 miles less than CVs on average ### .red[Non-Tesla BEVs:<br>-5,400 miles] ### .blue[Tesla:<br>-2,800 miles] ] --- background-color: #fff .leftcol65[ <center> <img src="images/table-reg-powertrain-zoom1.png" width=100%> </center> ] .rightcol35[ **Non-linear range effect**: +10 mi range: .red[Low range (<100 mi):<br>+640 mi/yr] .red[Mid range (100-200 mi):<br>+420 mi/yr] .red[High range (\>200 mi):<br>+90 mi/yr] ] --- background-color: #fff .leftcol65[ <center> <img src="images/table-reg-powertrain-zoom2.png" width=100%> </center> ] .rightcol35[ **Non-linear range effect**: +10 mi range: .red[Low range (<100 mi):<br>+640 mi/yr] .red[Mid range (100-200 mi):<br>+420 mi/yr] .red[High range (\>200 mi):<br>+90 mi/yr] <br> .blue[Tesla effect isn't just from range] ] --- ## Key takeaways -- ### - BEVs are driven significantly less than other powertrains:<br>.red[Non-Tesla BEVs: -5,400 miles]; .blue[Tesla: -2,800 miles] -- ### - Far less variability in BEV mileage than CV mileage<br>(BEVs only substituting for lower-mileage CV usage) -- ### - BEV mileage less sensitive to operating cost than CV mileage -- ### - Range increases mileage for low-range BEVs more than high-range BEVs --- class: middle, inverse .leftcol70[ ### Battery-Powered Bargains?<br>Measuring Electric Vehicle Resale Value in the United States Laura Roberson (Ph.D. Student)<br> John Paul Helveston, Ph.D. ] .rightcol30[ <br> <center> <img src="images/qr-erl.png" width=60%> </center> ] --- background-color: #fff class: center ## The vehicle resale market is critically important -- .leftcol[ ## 70% of sales are<br>used vehicles <center> <img src="images/resale-sales.png" width=100%> </center> ] -- .rightcol[ ## Used vehicles are more affordable (pre-covid) <center> <img src="images/resale-prices.png" width=100%> </center> ] --- # .center[We really need to understand PEV resale value] -- <br> ### - Depreciation is a key component in "Total Cost of Ownership" (TCO) models, e.g. [ANL's TCO Study](https://publications.anl.gov/anlpubs/2021/05/167399.pdf) -- ### - "Resale anxiety" a potential obstacle to electric vehicle adoption [Brückmann et al. (2021)](https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ac3531) -- ### - BEV buyers nervous about depreciation tend to lease rather than buy [Dua et al. (2019)](https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S235248471930068X) --- background-color: #fff ## Prior research suggests PEVs depreciate faster than CVs <center> <img src="images/pev-resale-lit.png" width=100%> </center> --- class: middle, center background-color: #fff # Value Retention Rate: `\(r = \frac{Listing Price}{MSRP}\)` --- class: center background-color: #fff ## BEVs & PHEVs are depreciating worse than CVs and HEVs ### (Except .blue[Tesla]) <center> <img src="images/rr-all.png" width=100%> </center> Data: All listings between 2016 - 2019 (inclusive) --- # Modeling retention rate as exponential decay <center> <img src="images/rr.png" width=55%> </center> --- background-color: #fff <center> <img src="images/depreciation.png" width=100%> </center> --- background-color: #fff class:center ## Newer PEVs are holding value better than older PEVs <br> <center> <img src="images/rr-time.png" width=100%> </center> --- background-color: #fff class:center .leftcol25[ <br> ## Longer-range BEVs hold value better, w/diminishing returns at 200+ miles ] .rightcol75[ <center> <img src="images/range.png" width=100%> </center> ] --- background-color: #fff class:center .leftcol25[ <br> ## Used EVs gain additional benefit from new vehicle subsidies with no additional cost to gov’t ] .rightcol75[ <center> <img src="images/subsidy.png" width=100%> </center> ] --- background-color: #fff class:center ## COVID-19 had substantial impact on used vehicle pricing <center> <img src="images/covid.png" width=70%> </center> --- ## Key takeaways -- ### - BEVs have depreciated faster than CVs, but this is changing! -- ### - Newer model BEVs with higher ranges are holding their value more similarly to CVs. -- ### - Subsidies for new BEVs pass ~3% lower prices in used market -- ### - Post COVID19 pandemic used prices are up ~40% --- class: inverse background-image: url("images/blue.jpg") background-size: cover <br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> # Thanks! ### Slides: ### https://slides.jhelvy.com/2024-issst-conf/ .footer-large[.white[.right[ @jhelvy@fediscience.org
<br> @JohnHelveston
<br> @jhelvy
<br> jhelvy.com
<br> jph@gwu.edu
]]] --- class: center, middle, inverse # Extra slides --- background-color: #fff <center> Cars <img src="images/mileage-scatter-cars.png" width=100%> </center> <br> <center> SUVs <img src="images/mileage-scatter-suvs.png" width=100%> </center> ??? BEVs:<br>~7k mi/yr All others:<br>~11k - 12k mi/yr Far less variability in BEV mileage than CV mileage --- background-color: #fff ### .center[BEV mileage less sensitive to operating cost than CV mileage] <center> <img src="images/table-reg-powertrain-cpm.png" width=1000> </center> 1 cent increase in operating cost: BEV: -69 mi/yr<br> CV: -136 mi/yr<br> --- background-color: #fff ### .center[BEV mileage less sensitive to operating cost than CV mileage] <center> <img src="images/table-reg-powertrain-cpm.png" width=1000> </center> .leftcol70[ <center> <img src="images/cost-per-mile.png" width=600> </center> ] .rightcol30[ 1 cent increase in operating cost: BEV: -69 mi/yr<br> CV: -136 mi/yr<br> .blue[BEVs have much lower operating costs] ] --- name: why-vmt class: center, middle, inverse # Why low BEV mileage? --- # Why low BEV mileage? .leftcol40[ ### **Intra-household substitution?** Maybe current adopters have multiple cars? Perhaps, but NHTS data suggests **secondary cars are only driven 1,000 - 2,000 miles less per year**. ] .rightcol60[ <center> <img src="images/table-nhts.png" width=100%> </center> ] --- # Why low BEV mileage? .leftcol40[ ### **Maybe newer models are driven more?** Some (limited) evidence this may be the case (MY 2019: only 10,484 listings, max age of 3.2 years old) ] .rightcol60[ <center> <img src="images/table-my-zoom.png" width=100%> </center> ] --- # Why low BEV mileage? .leftcol40[ ### **Selection bias?** Maybe current adopters just have lower driving needs? No way for us to measure this, but it seems very plausible ] .rightcol60[ <center> <img src="images/plane.jpg" width=100%> </center> ] --- class: middle, center background-color: #fff .leftcol[ ## `\(\frac{Price}{MSRP}\)` <center> <img src="images/rr-bev.png" width=100%> </center> ] -- .rightcol[ ## `\(\frac{Price}{MSRP - Subsidy}\)` <center> <img src="images/arr-bev.png" width=100%> </center> ] --- class: center ### PEV subsidies for new cars (should) impact used car pricing -- .leftcol[ ### New Market (MSRP - Subsidy = Price)<br> $30,000 - $7,500 = **$22,500** <center> <img src="images/nissan-leaf.png" width=100%> </center> <br><br> .font70[.left[Image source: https://www.pngwing.com/en/free-png-yaftj]] ] -- .rightcol[ ### Used Market (Assuming adequate supply)<br> Max Price = **$22,500** <center> <img src="images/nissan-leaf.png" width=100%> </center> ] --- background-color: #fff class:center ## Two year `\(r\)` by model shows huge gains in newer BEVs <center> <img src="images/rr-by-model.png" width=100%> </center>